Three meme tokens—$MOODENG, $POPCAT, and $JELLYJELLY—appear to have fallen victim to the same market manipulation playbook.
The scheme? Artificially inflated open interest figures funneled through decentralized exchanges. By exploiting the transparency gaps inherent in some DEX protocols, manipulators can create the illusion of genuine trading activity and liquidity depth that simply doesn't exist.
This tactic isn't new, but it's becoming disturbingly common in the meme coin sector. When open interest numbers look suspiciously robust on decentralized platforms while centralized exchange data tells a different story, that's your first red flag. The discrepancy usually means someone's cooking the books—layering fake positions to lure retail traders into what looks like a hot market.
What makes this particularly dangerous is how it feeds the FOMO cycle. Traders see rising OI, assume smart money is piling in, and jump aboard without questioning the data source. By the time the manipulation unwinds, early participants have already exited with profits while latecomers are left holding increasingly worthless bags.
For anyone trading meme tokens or low-cap altcoins, cross-referencing data across multiple platforms isn't optional anymore—it's survival strategy. If the numbers don't align between DEXs and CEXs, or if volume spikes seem detached from actual community engagement and development updates, proceed with extreme caution. The same manipulation pattern hitting three different tokens suggests this is becoming a standardized attack vector, and more projects will likely get targeted using identical methods.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Three meme tokens—$MOODENG, $POPCAT, and $JELLYJELLY—appear to have fallen victim to the same market manipulation playbook.
The scheme? Artificially inflated open interest figures funneled through decentralized exchanges. By exploiting the transparency gaps inherent in some DEX protocols, manipulators can create the illusion of genuine trading activity and liquidity depth that simply doesn't exist.
This tactic isn't new, but it's becoming disturbingly common in the meme coin sector. When open interest numbers look suspiciously robust on decentralized platforms while centralized exchange data tells a different story, that's your first red flag. The discrepancy usually means someone's cooking the books—layering fake positions to lure retail traders into what looks like a hot market.
What makes this particularly dangerous is how it feeds the FOMO cycle. Traders see rising OI, assume smart money is piling in, and jump aboard without questioning the data source. By the time the manipulation unwinds, early participants have already exited with profits while latecomers are left holding increasingly worthless bags.
For anyone trading meme tokens or low-cap altcoins, cross-referencing data across multiple platforms isn't optional anymore—it's survival strategy. If the numbers don't align between DEXs and CEXs, or if volume spikes seem detached from actual community engagement and development updates, proceed with extreme caution. The same manipulation pattern hitting three different tokens suggests this is becoming a standardized attack vector, and more projects will likely get targeted using identical methods.