A certain top exchange founder has once again been pushed to the edge by “tweet archaeology.” On December 7, this big shot retweeted an explanation post about “community-driven actions,” with a rather tough tone: “DOYR? Do Your Meme? Interpret it however you want. Even if someone launches a token based on one of my catchphrases, I’ll say whatever I want to say, but these words have nothing to do with whether I endorse any particular token—completely separate things.”

In plain English: Don’t take a random thing I say and use it to fleece retail investors—I’m not endorsing any project.

Anyone in crypto knows how “unlucky” this guy has been—previously, he posted a photo of his pet dog “Broccoli,” and within moments, hundreds of broccoli-themed tokens popped up on-chain. The BNB Chain was overwhelmed to the point of crashing, and retail investors lost so much they deleted their Twitter accounts overnight. Later, he just mentioned a charity education project called Giggle Academy, and in no time, someone launched a $GIGGLE token. After a wild pump and dump, he had to clarify overnight: “I have nothing to do with it.”

This time he’s even more direct: Even if I casually mention an acronym, go ahead and launch a token if you want—but don’t come blaming me if you lose money. After all, there really were people who aped into meme coins after reading his tweets and, after getting wrecked, turned around and accused him of “leading the rug”—so this move basically engraves his disclaimer into his DNA.

The comment section is already losing it:
“So you tweet for clout, and we end up as exit liquidity?”
“Next time he says ‘good morning’, do we need to watch out for someone launching a $GOODMORNING token?”

Ironically, the more he clarifies, the more hyped the community gets—“using the big shot’s catchphrases” has already become a meme coin traffic magnet. Now the question is: Will some team actually latch onto the $DOYR ticker and kick off another meme frenzy?

Behind this farce lies a harsh truth: When someone’s every word can become a target for speculation, where exactly is the boundary between “influence” and “responsibility”?