Can LUNC Reach $0.1? Let’s Do the Math First

Recently, I’ve seen people hyping up LUNC “going to the moon” again. Honestly, this topic has never really cooled off. But if we’re serious about hitting that $0.1 price point, what would it actually take? Math doesn’t lie—with the current circulating supply, the market cap would have to soar to around $58 billion.

Here’s the question: Is that realistic?

To put it bluntly, the only possible path is massive deflation. It’s not about burning tens or hundreds of millions just for show—it would require eliminating over 99% of the supply. That sounds crazy, but if you think about LUNC’s history, it was born out of extreme events and is a special case. The burn mechanism is in place; the real question is whether the pace and determination are enough.

On-chain data shows that there are indeed whales continuously accumulating. Developers are also pushing various proposals, and the community voting rounds keep coming. What does all this mean? At the very least, it shows that some people are taking this possibility seriously—it’s not just hype with nothing behind it.

But let’s be clear, the risks are real:
Regulatory policies could change at any time, market sentiment can flip on a dime, and technical implementation might hit roadblocks. Betting everything on the miracle of a single token’s burn? That’s not investing, that’s gambling.

A sharp drop in supply does create scarcity, and if demand keeps up, the price could definitely have room to grow. But “if”—that’s often the most expensive word in crypto.

So what do you think? How far can LUNC’s burn plan go? Share your thoughts in the comments. Using data to back your view is way more interesting than just shouting with emotion.