You might not know this, but no matter how well AI models perform in the lab, they often fail in real-world environments—data shows that 87% to 90% of models crash when fed unverified or inconsistent data.
Right now, TAO is gaining a lot of momentum in the AI sector, but don't forget another easily overlooked player: IOTA, which is working on the data validation layer. When AI starts penetrating areas like logistics and trade, the rules of the game change. Simply stacking computing power is no longer enough; the key is whether the information you feed to AI is reliable.
IOTA's role here is to anchor documents, identity information, and audit records, especially in cross-border systems. Computing power can make AI run fast, but only validated data can make it run correctly. That's why the data infrastructure layer is becoming increasingly important—no matter how smart the model is, feeding it the wrong data is pointless.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
pvt_key_collector
· 8h ago
87% to 90% crash directly, those numbers are pretty scary. No wonder so many large models fail in production environments.
IOTA’s approach is pretty good; data validation is indeed an overlooked goldmine. TAO may be hot, but if you don’t feed in clean data, it’s all for nothing.
If IOTA can really pull off cross-border logistics, that’ll be the next big thing.
Feeding the right data is way more powerful than just computing power—this hits the nail on the head.
Feels like business at the Web3 infrastructure layer is actually more profitable than the application layer. Whoever solves the data trust problem wins.
View OriginalReply0
加密陈队长
· 11h ago
vgghhhhhhhjjkkjggffff ggghhhifgghf cvghjjhcccc
Reply0
DaoTherapy
· 12-06 11:51
87% to 90% crash? That number sounds like a black swan event... But honestly, with all the hype around TAO, no one really cares what AI is actually consuming. IOTA's data validation logic does hit the mark, but how many projects are truly willing to slow down and do this work?
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 12-06 11:50
Damn, an 87% failure rate? That data is scary, no wonder those AI projects keep having issues.
TAO is grabbing the spotlight, while IOTA is quietly laying the data foundation in the corner, but that's the real deal.
Feeding garbage data to the models wastes even the most powerful computing power; someone needs to oversee this.
That verification layer is really needed for cross-border trade—otherwise, relying blindly on AI for direction is way too risky.
Data is king. Nobody cared before, but now people are finally starting to pay attention.
Computing power alone isn't enough; reliable information is the real lifeblood of AI.
People trading coins often ignore the underlying infrastructure, but that's actually where the real value is.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPaper
· 12-06 11:36
87% of models crash instantly, this data is insane... Just throwing money at computing power is pointless. TAO is hot, but I've seen through IOTA on this point.
Feeding the wrong data kills AI too; the validation layer is the real trump card.
No matter how well it performs in the lab, in the real world, one dose of bad data and it's game over. Wake up, everyone.
What IOTA is doing is actually pretty impressive, but the market still doesn't get it.
No matter how strong the model is, if the data isn't clean, it's useless—it's basically a dimensionality reduction attack.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 12-06 11:31
87 to 90% collapse directly? This data is outrageous, need to verify the source...
But to be honest, IOTA as an entry point has truly been underestimated, the data validation layer is indeed the next big trend.
No matter how powerful AI is, it's useless without good data. This logic is solid.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecovery
· 12-06 11:29
yeah 87-90% failure rate isn't even surprising anymore... called this shit years ago tbh
data validation layer actually hits different once you're past the hype cycle. iota's angle makes sense but execution is everything
You might not know this, but no matter how well AI models perform in the lab, they often fail in real-world environments—data shows that 87% to 90% of models crash when fed unverified or inconsistent data.
Right now, TAO is gaining a lot of momentum in the AI sector, but don't forget another easily overlooked player: IOTA, which is working on the data validation layer. When AI starts penetrating areas like logistics and trade, the rules of the game change. Simply stacking computing power is no longer enough; the key is whether the information you feed to AI is reliable.
IOTA's role here is to anchor documents, identity information, and audit records, especially in cross-border systems. Computing power can make AI run fast, but only validated data can make it run correctly. That's why the data infrastructure layer is becoming increasingly important—no matter how smart the model is, feeding it the wrong data is pointless.