#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 pippin made a comeback this time, managed to recover some losses. But the funding rate design of this token is really outrageous—settled every hour, holding costs just keep climbing, and a lot of people simply can't keep up with this pace.
Honestly, I personally don't recommend touching this kind of contract. With such a high-frequency rate, it's obviously targeting retail investors. I’ve heard that some people are already hiring investigators over at BMT to look into the project team. But even if manipulation is uncovered, chances are nobody will care—this industry, as you know, is full of gray areas.
At least this situation serves as a reminder: when choosing a project, you can't just look at price movements; you have to keep a close eye on funding rates, liquidity, and the team's background. After all, it's your own money—don't let yourself get rekt without even realizing what happened.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
pvt_key_collector
· 12-06 10:50
Settlement every 1 hour? Damn, this is basically a cash machine. Retail investors going in are just giving away money.
I really don’t get those contracts with insanely high funding rates. I can’t understand why people still rush into them.
It’s pointless to investigate these gray areas; that’s just how this industry is. You’ll get used to it.
With fees this outrageous, it should have blown up a long time ago.
Anyone who picks coins just by looking at the charts is an idiot; you have to look at how the counterparty is reaping profits.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 12-06 10:50
Man, this fee structure is just ridiculous—settling every hour is basically trying to bleed people dry.
Check the project? This space has been a mess for a long time, what's the point of checking anything?
Alright, alright, I guess I have to be more careful myself, otherwise I’ll get rekt every day.
You really have to figure out how funding rates work, otherwise you’ll just end up paying a “dumb tax” for nothing.
At the end of the day, it’s still the same old saying: greed is the original sin—steady profits are way better than chasing doubles.
Yeah, pippin went up, but I’d never touch this contract, it’s way too painful.
Retail traders here are really just like lambs to the slaughter—you have to learn how to play the other side.
Tokens with these high-frequency fees are just blatantly harvesting newbies. You’d have to be clueless to jump in.
The traps in contracts run deep, bro—cherish your life and stay far away from these kinds of setups.
Seriously, watching the price pump feels great, but the holding cost just eats you alive—you’ll lose your shirt in this game.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfer
· 12-06 10:34
The funding rate is so high and frequent, it's just blatant exploitation.
Retail investors can't handle it, while the whales are laughing—this trick has been played so many times.
If the fee structure isn't transparent, just stay away. I've learned my lesson.
On BMT, they do some investigations, but there are plenty of things nobody cares about.
Next time I look at any token, the first thing I'll check is the funding rate, to avoid getting played.
View OriginalReply0
StableNomad
· 12-06 10:33
hourly funding resets? that's just liquidation theater with extra steps, reminds me of UST in May except this time they're collecting the premium upfront lol
Reply0
RuntimeError
· 12-06 10:23
Settlement every 1 hour? That's even more outrageous than loan sharks.
With such a crazy fee structure, it's obviously designed to fleece retail investors. Not getting involved.
There's no point checking the project team either, that's just how this space works.
Pay attention to the funding rate and the background. Don't blindly buy like a fool.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 12-06 10:21
Hmm...settling every 1 hour? This design is really something, it's basically just farming for arbitrage.
Pippin's current market is decent, but the fee structure has always been toxic, we still need to be cautious.
I heard someone looked into it? But in this circle... you know how it is, investigations are pointless.
You need to look at all aspects when picking coins, not just focus on price fluctuations. Funding fees can really mess you up.
To put it simply, just don't get rekt, you have to guard yourself.
#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 pippin made a comeback this time, managed to recover some losses. But the funding rate design of this token is really outrageous—settled every hour, holding costs just keep climbing, and a lot of people simply can't keep up with this pace.
Honestly, I personally don't recommend touching this kind of contract. With such a high-frequency rate, it's obviously targeting retail investors. I’ve heard that some people are already hiring investigators over at BMT to look into the project team. But even if manipulation is uncovered, chances are nobody will care—this industry, as you know, is full of gray areas.
At least this situation serves as a reminder: when choosing a project, you can't just look at price movements; you have to keep a close eye on funding rates, liquidity, and the team's background. After all, it's your own money—don't let yourself get rekt without even realizing what happened.