Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Quantitative firm's core management team undergoes a personnel change; the e-commerce facade cannot hide the underlying lending support.
Author | Sun Ningyu
Editor | Jiang Zhou
Quant派 (02685.HK), which just celebrated its three-month listing, is currently facing a double blow of management upheaval and a plunging stock price.
Operational Pathways Highly Overlapping
In early March 2026, the core management team of Quant派 suddenly underwent a major reshuffle, with the former CTO and non-executive director resigning one after another, and a post-90s cross-border e-commerce practitioner and MIT robotics PhD being appointed to key positions.
Before the personnel changes even settled, the stock price began a sharp decline. Over ten days, it halved, specifically dropping from an intraday high of HKD 43.360 on March 10 to an intraday low of HKD 20.080 on March 28, with market value evaporating significantly.
Image source: wind
The main trigger for this plunge is directly linked to a compliance crisis in their business. On March 13, the State Administration of Financial Regulation issued a risk warning, highlighting violations involving installment shopping and cash-out disguised as lending, which closely resemble the operational paths of Quant派’s subsidiaries Yang Xiao Mie Mall and related platforms like LiKaBao.
As of now, the Black Cat platform has received over 31k complaints related to “Yang Xiao Mie,” with issues like product overpricing, high-interest installment plans, and inducement to cash out being the main user grievances. Market trust has rapidly declined.
This crisis is a concentrated outbreak of hidden risks accumulated over years of “changing masks” by Quant派. Founded in 2014 with a loan assistance product “Credit Wallet,” the company relied on loan matchmaking to establish itself. In 2017, as it aimed for a U.S. listing, it was hit by strict regulations on cash loans and had to withdraw.
To evade regulatory scrutiny, in 2020, it renamed its product to Yang Xiao Mie, disguising it as a consumer e-commerce platform. After eight years of refinement, five filings, and two rounds of equity restructuring, claiming to have completely separated from loan assistance, it finally listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in November 2025.
This IPO was a bloodbath, raising HKD 131 million, with over 90% spent on listing expenses, and net proceeds only HKD 12.37 million. The reason for risking personal funds to go public was to resolve a HKD 1.8 billion redemption debt on preferred shares.
Operational Difficulties Remain Unsolved
According to the prospectus, as of May 2025, Quant派’s net assets were negative HKD 770 million, with long-term insolvency, and the listing merely delayed debt repayment pressures; the fundamental operational crisis remains unresolved.
Beneath the e-commerce facade, Quant派’s core profit logic still relies on high-margin loan assistance. Yang Xiao Mie contributes over 90% of revenue, with about 80% of orders relying on installment payments. Previously, financial matchmaking business margins reached as high as 99.2%, far exceeding traditional e-commerce levels.
The entire operation forms a gray closed loop: users obtain credit limits via LiKaBao, then place high-priced orders on Yang Xiao Mie, and finally cash out at low prices through third-party buyers. Actual case tests show that for the same digital products, Yang Xiao Mie’s prices are over 30% higher; while the installment rate appears compliant on the surface, the actual comprehensive financing cost after cashing out has long exceeded the judicial protection red line of 24%.
Although the company claims to have cut ties with the related business, the flow of business and fund disbursements remain deeply intertwined. The ownership and legal representatives of related companies still have hidden overlaps, making the so-called complete separation more superficial than real.
Meanwhile, users frequently receive harassment messages about cashing out after registration, and the platform has yet to explain the loopholes in data security, fueling ongoing compliance disputes.
Quant派’s predicament is also a microcosm of the entire loan assistance industry’s transformation. With new regulations on loan assistance coming into effect and the latest explicit financing cost policies in 2026, arbitrage methods like product overpricing, hidden interest fees, and private cash-outs have been precisely blocked by regulators.
Lack of Scenario Support
Previously, many loan assistance platforms clustered around installment malls, relying on high-priced installment plans and linked recovery channels to indirectly offer high-interest loans. The core appeal was the enormous profit margin from loan assistance far exceeding e-commerce.
Now, regulatory authorities are implementing penetrating rectification, strictly scrutinizing business substance, blocking payment channels, and conducting special investigations across multiple dimensions. The survival space for these gray models is continuously shrinking, and the industry is undergoing a deep reshuffle. Simply changing masks to evade regulation is no longer feasible.
Objectively, Quant派 has accumulated over a million monthly active users and possesses mature traffic operation and algorithm recommendation capabilities, with a foundational traffic value in the lower-tier consumer installment sector. However, this value is entirely dependent on non-compliant cash-out models and lacks genuine e-commerce scenario support.
In the long term, the consumer finance industry prioritizes behavioral regulation. Only platforms with licensed operations, genuine scenarios, and transparent interest and fee disclosures can stand firm. Currently, the company’s promoted stories of cross-border e-commerce and AI technology transformation seem promising but face fatal shortcomings: limited fundraising, long-term financial insolvency, and an inability to support R&D and new track deployment.
At present, on the compliance front, Quant派’s business touches regulatory red lines, risking penalties or even affecting its listing status; financially, cash flow is under pressure, and insolvency leaves no funds for transformation.
Operationally, revenue heavily depends on illegal installment business, making the business structure fragile; combined with frequent management changes, deteriorating brand reputation, and ongoing user loss, the company’s future prospects are bleak.
From cash loans to installment malls, from five filings to a bloodied IPO, the era of arbitrage walking the regulatory edge has ended. Unless the company can thoroughly abandon manipulative tactics and return to compliant business fundamentals, Quant派 will ultimately be abandoned by both regulators and the capital markets.
A word of caution to readers: this article is based on publicly available information or content provided by interviewees. Global Financial Talk and the author do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the information. Under no circumstances does this content constitute investment advice. Markets are risky; invest cautiously! Unauthorized reproduction or plagiarism is prohibited!