Utah to Ban Prediction Markets, State-Federal Regulatory Dispute Escalates

SmartContractAuditor · 2026-03-12T10:31:44+00:00

Utah's HB243 bill defines "proposition betting" as gambling, aiming to prohibit prediction market platforms from operating. The governor plans to sign the bill, Kalshi has filed a lawsuit challenging the classification of its event contracts, the CFTC has stated it has regulatory authority, and supports the value of prediction markets.

SmartContractAuditor

2026-03-12 10:31:44

Abstract generation in progress

Odaily Planet Daily News: Utah HB243 has been submitted to the governor’s office. The bill defines “prediction betting” as gambling, aiming to prevent prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket from operating in the state. Governor Spencer Cox has stated plans to sign the bill.

Kalshi previously filed a lawsuit against Utah, asking a federal judge to block the state’s enforcement of gambling restrictions, arguing that its event contracts are derivatives regulated by federal law rather than gambling. The CFTC claims exclusive jurisdiction over such markets under the Commodity Exchange Act. On the same day, Kalshi also filed a lawsuit against Iowa. Previously, a federal judge in Ohio dismissed Kalshi’s request to prevent state regulators from enforcing gambling laws.

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig stated that the agency has regulatory authority over prediction markets and warned it will defend this jurisdiction in court. Selig also said that well-functioning prediction markets are “truth machines,” believing that when participants fund their views, markets can produce signals more reliable than traditional polls.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.