Tap to Trade in Gate Square, Win up to 50 GT & Merch!
Click the trading widget in Gate Square content, complete a transaction, and take home 50 GT, Position Experience Vouchers, or exclusive Spring Festival merchandise.
Click the registration link to join
https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7401
Enter Gate Square daily and click any trading pair or trading card within the content to complete a transaction. The top 10 users by trading volume will win GT, Gate merchandise boxes, position experience vouchers, and more.
The top prize: 50 GT.
 and computing infrastructure that will eventually become obsolete or fail as technology advances. If these massive AI investments fail to deliver proportional profits, depreciation will become a significant long-term drag on corporate earnings. The market has essentially been financing a technological arms race where the victor isn’t guaranteed.
The Cape Ratio Signals Historical Valuation Extremes
History doesn’t repeat itself, but it follows recognizable patterns – especially in financial markets shaped by business cycles and interest rate shifts. The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, commonly known as the cape ratio, offers a crucial lens for understanding market valuations by smoothing out inflation and cyclical swings.
Currently, the cape ratio stands at approximately 40 – a level not witnessed since the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s, and far exceeding its long-term historical average of around 17.33. When the cape ratio reaches such extremes, it historically doesn’t remain elevated for long. This suggests investors should consider reducing exposure to richly valued technology stocks that carry the highest downside risk if sentiment shifts.
Why Corporate Profits Aren’t Keeping Pace
The generative AI boom has mirrored the California gold rush in an unexpected way: the real fortunes have gone to those selling the picks and shovels rather than those mining for gold. AI chipmaker Nvidia has thrived, with third-quarter earnings surging 62% year-over-year to $57 billion and profits climbing 65% to $31.9 billion. But this success story is the exception rather than the rule.
OpenAI, by contrast, faces potentially burning through $17 billion in cash throughout 2026, according to The Economist’s analysis. The company’s anticipated second-half IPO could confront investors with the stark economics behind the AI hype wave – and the market may not appreciate what it discovers.
Oracle provides a cautionary tale. Despite massive capital expenditure commitments of $50 billion this year, the company’s shares have plummeted roughly 52% from their all-time highs. More troublingly, Oracle’s revenue only grew 14% year-over-year to $16.1 billion – a lackluster pace that barely justifies the enormous spending commitment. This disconnect between investment and profitability serves as a harbinger of what could unfold across the technology sector in 2026.
Historical Patterns Point to Potential Correction
When investors lose patience with AI spending that fails to produce visible results, technology stock valuations could face widespread contraction. The cape ratio reaching 40 echoes a critical inflection point in market history. Each time this valuation metric has climbed into such rarefied territory, significant market corrections have followed.
The lesson is clear: valuation extremes are temporary, and markets inevitably revert to historical norms. With the cape ratio flashing red and AI investments showing profit challenges, 2026 could mark the year when markets demand actual results rather than ambitious promises. Investors who position themselves defensively now may avoid the painful lessons that come when speculative excess meets disappointing reality.