Tap to Trade in Gate Square, Win up to 50 GT & Merch!
Click the trading widget in Gate Square content, complete a transaction, and take home 50 GT, Position Experience Vouchers, or exclusive Spring Festival merchandise.
Click the registration link to join
https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7401
Enter Gate Square daily and click any trading pair or trading card within the content to complete a transaction. The top 10 users by trading volume will win GT, Gate merchandise boxes, position experience vouchers, and more.
The top prize: 50 GT.
 and massive capital spending by AI hyperscalers. Today, with the stock below that threshold, the question isn’t whether the prediction was right or wrong, but rather what we learned about making ambitious forecasts in a rapidly evolving tech landscape.
The Core Forecast Actually Delivered
Starting 2025 valued at just over $3 trillion, Nvidia needed a substantial surge to reach the $5 trillion target. That seemed unlikely when President Trump announced tariff policies in April, which triggered a sharp decline that pushed the company’s market value closer to $2 trillion. Yet the demand for cutting-edge AI infrastructure proved unstoppable. By October, Nvidia had rallied to cross the $5 trillion threshold, validating the core thesis: AI hyperscalers would continue spending aggressively on computing equipment, and Nvidia’s market dominance would drive consistent gains.
This wasn’t just a temporary blip. The underlying dynamics remained intact throughout 2025—there’s no indication they’ll shift significantly in 2026 either. The appetite for AI computing power continues unabated, and Nvidia’s position in that ecosystem remains unmatched.
The Major Miscalculation: Valuation Multiples
Here’s where the analysis fell short. At the end of 2024, when the prediction was made, Nvidia traded at 45 times forward earnings. While that seemed expensive at the time, the current valuation sits at 40 times forward earnings—actually cheaper than the initial assessment. But that’s where the story gets tricky.
The broader market has caught up. Other major technology companies now trade around 30 times forward earnings, giving Nvidia only a modest premium over its peers. This wasn’t the valuation trajectory many analysts expected. The assumption was that Nvidia’s valuation multiple might compress slightly while the stock climbed on pure earnings growth. Instead, the market repriced the entire tech sector upward, partially narrowing Nvidia’s relative valuation gap.
Why the Numbers Don’t Tell the Whole Story
Even at a 40-times forward earnings multiple, Nvidia isn’t a bargain by traditional measures. Yet the investment case remains compelling for one critical reason: revenue growth potential. Wall Street analysts are projecting 50% revenue growth for Nvidia in 2026, a pace that few major technology companies can match. That exceptional growth rate justifies a premium valuation in the eyes of believers.
Comparing Nvidia’s trajectory to historical tech success stories illustrates this point. An investment of $1,000 in Nvidia when it first appeared on The Motley Fool’s recommendation list in April 2005 would have grown to $1.14 million by January 2026—a testament to compounding returns when you identify transformative companies early.
What 2026 Holds
The prediction of a $5 trillion Nvidia isn’t dead; it’s merely waiting for the next rally. To hit that target and hold it sustainably would require only about 10% appreciation from current levels—roughly market-average returns. Whether Nvidia achieves that depends less on luck and more on whether the AI infrastructure spending boom continues as expected.
The broader takeaway: making specific predictions about tech valuations is inherently risky, especially in fast-moving sectors. Nvidia proved that the fundamental growth story was correct, but the precise valuation path differed from expectations. For investors evaluating whether Nvidia belongs in a portfolio for 2026, the question isn’t whether past forecasts were perfectly accurate—it’s whether the underlying conditions that drove those predictions remain valid.