Imagine a tricky scenario: you purchase a digital asset account from a certain channel, but unexpectedly, the original owner appears afterward. The other party presents valid and complete identification documents such as an ID card or passport, clearly claiming that the account belongs to them, and requests the platform to reset login passwords, withdrawal permissions, and other critical rights.



What should the platform do at this point? Should it trust the party able to provide genuine identification and complete supporting information, or believe the current account holder's unilateral statement?

This question may seem absurd, but it hits the core of account management issues in crypto exchanges. In the Web3 world, the ownership of accounts often lacks clear judicial precedents for reference. Identity verification mechanisms, multi-factor authentication processes, and risk control reviews all directly influence the final decision.

For exchanges, this is not only a technical issue but also a legal and ethical one—one wrong decision could lead to user assets being stolen. Therefore, most reputable platforms will prioritize trusting the applicant who can provide complete and authentic identity information. This is also why KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures are so important for crypto exchanges.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektCoastervip
· 3h ago
Wow, this trap is really incredible. Buying an account can still be counterattacked by the original owner. This is the charm of crypto.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNodevip
· 3h ago
This account security issue is indeed quite tricky. KYC has become a double-edged sword—does the platform trust the ID card or the holder of the coins? It's really a brain-teasing matter.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKarenvip
· 3h ago
This trick is too clever. Whoever shows their ID first wins? So what if I change my mind now? Should the platform help me change it back?
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperervip
· 3h ago
The tricks of buying and selling accounts, web3 is really full of traps Account ownership is not legally supported, and platforms are just like buddies, awkward KYC has instead become a talisman, isn't that ironic Damn, that's why I never touch second-hand accounts Once you show your ID card, you win, reality is so cruel Who’s to blame when platforms get caught in such disputes? No wonder exchanges require verification, so that's the logic I just want to ask, how do platforms handle accounts without verification? Do they freeze them directly?
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvestervip
· 3h ago
Damn, I've seen this trick before... I should have thought of this when buying accounts.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHandsvip
· 4h ago
This deal is really incredible; ownership of accounts is more complicated than legal battles.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomadvip
· 4h ago
Oh no, this is awkward... Basically, the platform has to bet on which side is real. KYC is essentially just using ID cards to speak.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)