2026-01-11 17:20:30

Decentralized social media is on fire, but no one has discussed a critical issue—where to store massive amounts of images and videos?

Use traditional storage solutions? The costs are simply unsustainable. That’s why SocialFi has never truly gained significant traction.

The emergence of Walrus Protocol has changed the game. As a storage protocol optimized specifically for Web3 applications, it reduces storage costs to a fraction of traditional solutions through innovative architecture design. This is not just a technological breakthrough but also directly opens the door for large-scale commercial use of SocialFi.

From an investment perspective, such infrastructure stocks are often the biggest beneficiaries of the sector’s growth. When the entire SocialFi ecosystem’s content storage relies on such infrastructure, the value of related tokens is firmly supported. As an enthusiast of this sector, the logic chain of $WAL is definitely worth paying attention to.

WAL2.71%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Tokenomics911

· 5h ago

Someone finally spoke out, the issue of storage costs being a bottleneck has long been a pitfall. Honestly, I didn't expect Walrus to cut costs so aggressively. If it really gets implemented, SocialFi could indeed have potential. But it still depends on the actual adoption rate; just being cheap isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0

POAPlectionist

· 5h ago

Really, storage issues have always been a big overlooked problem. NGL Walrus's approach indeed hits the mark, but it depends on whether it can truly be implemented later. Just talking about low cost and affordability isn't enough; the ecosystem needs to keep up as well.

View OriginalReply0

OvertimeSquid

· 5h ago

Hmm... Storage issues are indeed a pain point, but can Walrus really fight? It depends on actual implementation. --- That's right, which is why Dapp experience has always been subpar. --- $WAL has a clear logic, but there's a risk of narrative collapse that needs to be guarded against. --- Shovels do have imagination; SocialFi's growth relies on this kind of infrastructure. --- Can storage costs be reduced to negligible? That's an exaggeration; you'll know once you run a project. --- The track has the logic, but the key is whether the team can deliver. --- Instead of chasing tokens, it's better to focus on whether the ecosystem is truly being used; this is the real valuation anchor.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 5h ago

Really, storage has always been a pain point... but to be honest, Walrus managing to keep costs so low is indeed impressive.

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 5h ago

Someone finally spoke out, the storage cost issue should have been broken early on Without solving storage, SocialFi has no hope, this hits the core Let's see if Walrus can really survive These days, everyone dares to boast, but infrastructure needs to be solid Clear logic is clear, but there are more pitfalls in shovel stocks Wait and see the stability of the mainnet before considering, going all in now is too risky Is Walrus a solution to the content storage problem of SocialFi? I have some doubts But infrastructure is indeed a good track, it all depends on execution Lowered costs so much? Feels a bit optimistic I'm usually cautious about shovel stocks, but this idea really hits the pain point

View OriginalReply0