2026-01-11 03:20:13

There's a phenomenon worth discussing: recently, some Meme coins have been wildly pumped, with their market cap soaring from 4 million to 16 million in a short period. It indeed looks tempting. But if you look beyond the surface, you'll find that this is actually a classic speculative combination of IP effect + node narrative + platform hype.

Where's the problem? Meme coins fundamentally lack value support, which means what? It means that the manipulators can control the market and dump at any time. The risk of a high-level correction has already been maximized.

A straightforward piece of advice for beginners: the game of Meme coins is enough to watch; do not put real money into buying in. Without fundamentals supporting the price, how fast it falls can be just as fast as it rises.

MEME-2.13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DEXRobinHood

· 01-11 18:14

I've been saying this for a long time, this scheme cycles about ten times a year, and every time someone suffers heavy losses, and next time there will be new rookies rushing in.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBuffet

· 01-11 03:50

Who wouldn't be tempted by a 4x increase, but this is exactly the dealer's honey pot. Putting real money in just to be cut off, you can't play without fundamentals.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 01-11 03:49

It's the same story again. When it looks like it's rising rapidly, I want to buy in, but then I realize it's all just air.

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusBot

· 01-11 03:42

Here comes the same old scam to harvest retail investors, enough already.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-11 03:27

It's the same old story, every time it's the house's script to cut the leeks. Wait, this time the narrative at the node is especially intense. How come some people are actually throwing money in... No, just watch, don't get involved. Honestly, this round of cutting was pretty harsh; my friend lost more than half.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-11 03:21

A 4x increase looks exciting, but when you calculate the capital efficiency and risk ratio, it falls apart. --- From 4 million to 16 million, you need to break down the data—who is buying, who is selling, what is the liquidity depth—once you check on-chain evidence, everything is exposed. --- Things without fundamental support tend to fall as fast as they rise, sometimes even faster. Historical data has already made this clear. --- The IP effect is basically a combination of information asymmetry and herd mentality. Data speaks for itself; I only look at whether the arbitrage space is sufficient. --- Newcomers always hope to turn things around with one move, but they don’t realize that the market maker’s distribution plan has already been coded in. --- Pumping the price is indeed quick, but the cost function for taking over is designed to be extremely unfriendly. --- This operation is a standard volatility range arbitrage, but looking back at the profit curve... hmm, it’s losing even faster. --- When the price has no support, it will eventually crash. Instead of betting on probabilities, it’s better to find assets with genuine hedging strategies.

View OriginalReply0