After so many years of contract trading, watching countless people get liquidated and then blame everything else—cursing market manipulation, blaming the brutal行情, or calling themselves unlucky—honestly, I’ve been there too. I once lost half a year’s salary in a single liquidation, and I was furious at the time. But after the second time, I had a realization: it’s not the market’s fault, nor the leverage’s fault. The real culprit is poor risk control. Today, I want to share the low-risk mindset I’ve developed over the years, which might help you see contract trading in a new light.



**How scary is leverage really? Actually, you’ve misunderstood**

When people hear about 100x leverage, they start trembling, thinking it’s a gambler’s tool. But the truth is—leverage itself isn’t evil. The problem lies in how you use it.

Look at it from another angle: you have 100,000 USDT and trade with 100x leverage. But here’s the key: if you only use 1% of that, which is 1,000 USDT as margin, the outcome is completely different. Even if the market moves against you by 10%, you only lose 1% of your total funds. Notice, it’s not 1,000 USDT times 10% times 100x; it’s the position size of 1% times a 10% move, which results in a 1% loss of your total capital.

This is the crucial formula: **Actual risk = Leverage × Position ratio**.

Conversely, if you use all 100,000 USDT at 100x leverage, a 1% market move will liquidate your position immediately. But as long as you keep your position at 1% of your total funds, even with 100x leverage, the risk feels similar to a 1% price fluctuation in spot trading.

My own approach is: leverage can go up to 50x, but I strictly limit each trade’s position to within 3% of my total funds. This way, even if I make a wrong call, the loss per trade remains manageable.

**Stop-loss isn’t giving up; it’s buying insurance for yourself**

During the big drop in 2024, I analyzed some platform data and found that nearly 80% of liquidations happened like this: the account had already lost more than 5%, but the trader stubbornly held on, only to lose more and more, until finally being wiped out.

Here’s a hard rule: all reliable traders never let a single loss exceed 2% of their principal.

For example, if your capital is 50,000 USDT, 2% is 1,000 USDT. Once that trade loses 1,000 USDT, cut your losses immediately, regardless of how the market rebounds later. Sticking to this discipline, even if you lose 10% in a year, it’s better than getting wiped out in one shot. The data shows that most liquidations happen because traders refuse to cut losses, and in the end, the market teaches them a lesson.

The key is to understand—stop-loss isn’t admitting failure; it’s preserving your capital to fight another day. The difference between professional traders and gamblers often lies in this decisive stop-loss mindset.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyMinervip
· 5h ago
Really, I struggled with stop-loss for three years before I finally understood it. That's right, controlling position size is the key. I'm now also following the 3% rule. Reading the comments, I can tell there's another bunch of full-position traders... waiting to get wrecked and then blaming the market makers. I agree with this logic, but the key is execution. Most people simply can't do it. Indeed, not using stop-loss is the biggest form of self-sabotage. Several people around me have lost everything because of it.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911vip
· 01-10 17:53
Really, not setting a stop-loss is playing with fire. I've seen too many people hold on until liquidation. To be clear, leverage is not the main culprit; it's the inability to control your hands. I've been using the 3% position management discussed in this article for a long time, and the results have indeed become much more stable. Just look at the 80% liquidation data and you'll see that most people die because they can't bear to cut losses. My current only principle is: if you lose 2%, immediately exit. Preserving bullets is more important than winning once.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodlervip
· 01-10 14:58
The iron rule of stop-loss is truly a painful lesson; 80% liquidation happens right here. I've seen too many cases like this.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessengervip
· 01-10 14:56
That's right, this is the fundamental difference between gamblers and traders. If you can't bear to cut losses at that moment, you've already lost.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 01-10 14:56
Setting stop-loss is easy to talk about, but when your account starts turning green, it's hard to hold on. That's the toughest part.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLovervip
· 01-10 14:43
That’s so heartbreaking, I am one of that 80%, still regretting after holding on until now --- I need to remember the 3% position line, finally understanding why I kept crashing --- Stop-loss is really an art, knowing what to do and actually doing it are two different things --- Using 1% position with 100x leverage is something I never thought of, it’s like installing a fuse for myself --- Too many people are stuck on the stop-loss hurdle, I’ve been educated by the market several times myself --- This is the true way of trading, it’s not gambling, it’s a game of risk management --- After reading so many motivational articles, this one clarifies it well, data speaks the most convincingly --- A discipline of losing only 2% per trade is more effective than any technical indicator, the key is to stick with it --- I agree that leverage itself is not a crime, the real problem lies in how people use it
View OriginalReply0
degenonymousvip
· 01-10 14:29
You're really right, the hardest moment is when to cut losses. Watching the rebound, you want to hold on, but in the end, it's gone.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategistvip
· 01-10 14:29
Real risk = leverage × position size. This formula is correct, but do you know how many people still go all-in after reading it? [Laughing and crying] --- 80% of margin calls are due to reluctance to cut losses. Losing 10% in a year is actually much better than going to zero. Unfortunately, by the time you realize this, you're already a leek (newbie investor). --- An interesting point is that the chip distribution shows that big players control 3% of the position tightly, while retail investors insist on full positions to avoid sleepless nights. --- Stop-loss is just buying insurance. If you had heard this ten years ago, you wouldn't need to catch up now. --- Out of 150 people, 148 still go all-in after reading, a typical leek mentality. Knowing and doing are two different things. --- The key formula is correct, but execution is the real ceiling. Most people lack not logic, but that bit of courage.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)