After so many years of contract trading, watching countless people get liquidated and then blame everything else—cursing market manipulation, blaming the brutal行情, or calling themselves unlucky—honestly, I’ve been there too. I once lost half a year’s salary in a single liquidation, and I was furious at the time. But after the second time, I had a realization: it’s not the market’s fault, nor the leverage’s fault. The real culprit is poor risk control. Today, I want to share the low-risk mindset I’ve developed over the years, which might help you see contract trading in a new light.
**How scary is leverage really? Actually, you’ve misunderstood**
When people hear about 100x leverage, they start trembling, thinking it’s a gambler’s tool. But the truth is—leverage itself isn’t evil. The problem lies in how you use it.
Look at it from another angle: you have 100,000 USDT and trade with 100x leverage. But here’s the key: if you only use 1% of that, which is 1,000 USDT as margin, the outcome is completely different. Even if the market moves against you by 10%, you only lose 1% of your total funds. Notice, it’s not 1,000 USDT times 10% times 100x; it’s the position size of 1% times a 10% move, which results in a 1% loss of your total capital.
This is the crucial formula: **Actual risk = Leverage × Position ratio**.
Conversely, if you use all 100,000 USDT at 100x leverage, a 1% market move will liquidate your position immediately. But as long as you keep your position at 1% of your total funds, even with 100x leverage, the risk feels similar to a 1% price fluctuation in spot trading.
My own approach is: leverage can go up to 50x, but I strictly limit each trade’s position to within 3% of my total funds. This way, even if I make a wrong call, the loss per trade remains manageable.
**Stop-loss isn’t giving up; it’s buying insurance for yourself**
During the big drop in 2024, I analyzed some platform data and found that nearly 80% of liquidations happened like this: the account had already lost more than 5%, but the trader stubbornly held on, only to lose more and more, until finally being wiped out.
Here’s a hard rule: all reliable traders never let a single loss exceed 2% of their principal.
For example, if your capital is 50,000 USDT, 2% is 1,000 USDT. Once that trade loses 1,000 USDT, cut your losses immediately, regardless of how the market rebounds later. Sticking to this discipline, even if you lose 10% in a year, it’s better than getting wiped out in one shot. The data shows that most liquidations happen because traders refuse to cut losses, and in the end, the market teaches them a lesson.
The key is to understand—stop-loss isn’t admitting failure; it’s preserving your capital to fight another day. The difference between professional traders and gamblers often lies in this decisive stop-loss mindset.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyMiner
· 5h ago
Really, I struggled with stop-loss for three years before I finally understood it.
That's right, controlling position size is the key. I'm now also following the 3% rule.
Reading the comments, I can tell there's another bunch of full-position traders... waiting to get wrecked and then blaming the market makers.
I agree with this logic, but the key is execution. Most people simply can't do it.
Indeed, not using stop-loss is the biggest form of self-sabotage. Several people around me have lost everything because of it.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 01-10 17:53
Really, not setting a stop-loss is playing with fire. I've seen too many people hold on until liquidation.
To be clear, leverage is not the main culprit; it's the inability to control your hands.
I've been using the 3% position management discussed in this article for a long time, and the results have indeed become much more stable.
Just look at the 80% liquidation data and you'll see that most people die because they can't bear to cut losses.
My current only principle is: if you lose 2%, immediately exit. Preserving bullets is more important than winning once.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 01-10 14:58
The iron rule of stop-loss is truly a painful lesson; 80% liquidation happens right here. I've seen too many cases like this.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 01-10 14:56
That's right, this is the fundamental difference between gamblers and traders. If you can't bear to cut losses at that moment, you've already lost.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-10 14:56
Setting stop-loss is easy to talk about, but when your account starts turning green, it's hard to hold on. That's the toughest part.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 01-10 14:43
That’s so heartbreaking, I am one of that 80%, still regretting after holding on until now
---
I need to remember the 3% position line, finally understanding why I kept crashing
---
Stop-loss is really an art, knowing what to do and actually doing it are two different things
---
Using 1% position with 100x leverage is something I never thought of, it’s like installing a fuse for myself
---
Too many people are stuck on the stop-loss hurdle, I’ve been educated by the market several times myself
---
This is the true way of trading, it’s not gambling, it’s a game of risk management
---
After reading so many motivational articles, this one clarifies it well, data speaks the most convincingly
---
A discipline of losing only 2% per trade is more effective than any technical indicator, the key is to stick with it
---
I agree that leverage itself is not a crime, the real problem lies in how people use it
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 01-10 14:29
You're really right, the hardest moment is when to cut losses. Watching the rebound, you want to hold on, but in the end, it's gone.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 01-10 14:29
Real risk = leverage × position size. This formula is correct, but do you know how many people still go all-in after reading it? [Laughing and crying]
---
80% of margin calls are due to reluctance to cut losses. Losing 10% in a year is actually much better than going to zero. Unfortunately, by the time you realize this, you're already a leek (newbie investor).
---
An interesting point is that the chip distribution shows that big players control 3% of the position tightly, while retail investors insist on full positions to avoid sleepless nights.
---
Stop-loss is just buying insurance. If you had heard this ten years ago, you wouldn't need to catch up now.
---
Out of 150 people, 148 still go all-in after reading, a typical leek mentality. Knowing and doing are two different things.
---
The key formula is correct, but execution is the real ceiling. Most people lack not logic, but that bit of courage.
After so many years of contract trading, watching countless people get liquidated and then blame everything else—cursing market manipulation, blaming the brutal行情, or calling themselves unlucky—honestly, I’ve been there too. I once lost half a year’s salary in a single liquidation, and I was furious at the time. But after the second time, I had a realization: it’s not the market’s fault, nor the leverage’s fault. The real culprit is poor risk control. Today, I want to share the low-risk mindset I’ve developed over the years, which might help you see contract trading in a new light.
**How scary is leverage really? Actually, you’ve misunderstood**
When people hear about 100x leverage, they start trembling, thinking it’s a gambler’s tool. But the truth is—leverage itself isn’t evil. The problem lies in how you use it.
Look at it from another angle: you have 100,000 USDT and trade with 100x leverage. But here’s the key: if you only use 1% of that, which is 1,000 USDT as margin, the outcome is completely different. Even if the market moves against you by 10%, you only lose 1% of your total funds. Notice, it’s not 1,000 USDT times 10% times 100x; it’s the position size of 1% times a 10% move, which results in a 1% loss of your total capital.
This is the crucial formula: **Actual risk = Leverage × Position ratio**.
Conversely, if you use all 100,000 USDT at 100x leverage, a 1% market move will liquidate your position immediately. But as long as you keep your position at 1% of your total funds, even with 100x leverage, the risk feels similar to a 1% price fluctuation in spot trading.
My own approach is: leverage can go up to 50x, but I strictly limit each trade’s position to within 3% of my total funds. This way, even if I make a wrong call, the loss per trade remains manageable.
**Stop-loss isn’t giving up; it’s buying insurance for yourself**
During the big drop in 2024, I analyzed some platform data and found that nearly 80% of liquidations happened like this: the account had already lost more than 5%, but the trader stubbornly held on, only to lose more and more, until finally being wiped out.
Here’s a hard rule: all reliable traders never let a single loss exceed 2% of their principal.
For example, if your capital is 50,000 USDT, 2% is 1,000 USDT. Once that trade loses 1,000 USDT, cut your losses immediately, regardless of how the market rebounds later. Sticking to this discipline, even if you lose 10% in a year, it’s better than getting wiped out in one shot. The data shows that most liquidations happen because traders refuse to cut losses, and in the end, the market teaches them a lesson.
The key is to understand—stop-loss isn’t admitting failure; it’s preserving your capital to fight another day. The difference between professional traders and gamblers often lies in this decisive stop-loss mindset.