There's an interesting play unfolding in the perpetual trading space that deserves attention. A hybrid platform is taking shape that merges centralized order execution efficiency with on-chain custody security—essentially bridging two worlds that traditionally don't mix well.
The team behind this approach has already convinced serious backers. They've pulled in $20.2M across two funding rounds, with backing from Slow Ventures, Quantstamp, and Kraken Ventures leading the charge. That kind of capital support signals institutional confidence in the model.
What makes this worth monitoring is the architecture itself. By keeping trades executed through centralized matching while assets remain self-custodied on-chain, they're attempting to solve the age-old tradeoff between speed and security. Whether it actually delivers on that promise will determine if this becomes a genuine alternative or just another experimental approach in an increasingly crowded market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleStalker
· 01-10 23:36
Centralized matching + on-chain self-custody, this architecture sounds good, but how many can actually run it? Over 20 million in funding shows that some people do believe in it—now it's just a matter of whether it can be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 01-10 14:54
NGL, this architecture sounds pretty good, but can centralized matching + on-chain self-custody really be perfectly combined... It still depends on the actual results.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 01-10 14:52
ngl this hybrid model sounds good, but will it turn out to be another story when it’s actually implemented...
Wait, can over 20 million in funding really resolve the conflicts between CEX and on-chain? I’m a bit skeptical
Can speed and security be both achieved, or are they just fooling retail investors again?
Early participants in such projects are probably gamblers, I think I’ll wait and see
Why does it seem like there’s a new "innovative solution" in perpetual trading every month...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 01-10 14:42
The combination of CEX and DEX sounds good, but can it really solve trust issues? Or is it just another fundraising story?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 01-10 14:37
Centralized matching combined with on-chain self-custody—this combination sounds impressive, but how many have actually succeeded? Over 20 million in funding sounds impressive, but the key is how they perform after launch.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 01-10 14:34
NGL, this hybrid mode sounds good, but whether it can really take off depends on... Another project that either changes the game or becomes cannon fodder.
There's an interesting play unfolding in the perpetual trading space that deserves attention. A hybrid platform is taking shape that merges centralized order execution efficiency with on-chain custody security—essentially bridging two worlds that traditionally don't mix well.
The team behind this approach has already convinced serious backers. They've pulled in $20.2M across two funding rounds, with backing from Slow Ventures, Quantstamp, and Kraken Ventures leading the charge. That kind of capital support signals institutional confidence in the model.
What makes this worth monitoring is the architecture itself. By keeping trades executed through centralized matching while assets remain self-custodied on-chain, they're attempting to solve the age-old tradeoff between speed and security. Whether it actually delivers on that promise will determine if this becomes a genuine alternative or just another experimental approach in an increasingly crowded market.