2026-01-10 13:25:39

Why can XRP operate stably? Because it has its own independent L1.

The logic is actually very simple: large-scale payment systems simply cannot survive on shared infrastructure. They need three things — predictable fees, stable performance, and rules that don't change due to network congestion.

Therefore, truly serious systems never rent block space. Their only choice is to have their own chain.

What did this mean in the past? It meant that the team had to spend years building infrastructure from scratch. Now, this game has changed.

Developers can launch their own L1 in just a few minutes, gaining control from day one. This shift is already happening. TANSSI is a product of this direction — enabling anyone to quickly deploy their own L1.

XRP-0.23%

TANSSI-1.91%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainHolmes

· 01-10 13:55

Oh wow, this is the truth. Shared chains are meant for small players; big businesses definitely need their own territory. By the way, is TANSSI really that easy to launch now? It still feels like the barrier is quite high. XRP has long seen through this, no wonder it's so stable.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 01-10 13:47

Independent L1s are indeed a necessity, but what about reality? Most projects can't even maintain their own chain, and in the end, they still have to rely on the ecosystem to support them.

View OriginalReply0

MetaNeighbor

· 01-10 13:41

That's right, your own chain is the way to go. But speaking of which, is TANSSI really reliable? It seems like every month there's a new project claiming to be able to handle L1 in minutes...

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 01-10 13:39

This logic isn't a problem, but XRP stability really isn't because of L1... It's probably just because people are naive and have lots of money, haha. Deploying L1 quickly sounds great, but who will maintain it? Who will ensure security? It feels like another new scheme to cut the leeks. But I have to admit, having control over everything is definitely more comfortable than being tortured by public chains. As long as there's no network congestion.

View OriginalReply0