Recently, $DUSK's performance has indeed attracted quite a bit of attention. Wave after wave of rises has people pondering when it will land on the contract, with small amounts first accumulated to wait for opportunities.

But if you look at Dusk purely from a trading perspective, it's easy to overlook a deeper aspect. Many people are still asking: does blockchain prioritize privacy or compliance? That question itself is misguided.

The Dusk Foundation's approach is quite the opposite—they demonstrate that these two are not mutually exclusive. As RWA applications expand, institutional funds continue to flow in, and regulatory frameworks gradually improve, Dusk has chosen a more challenging but also more realistic path: privacy as the default state, but fully supporting audits.

This is not just a marketing concept, but a design logic truly embedded into the Layer1 protocol. Considering the balance between privacy and auditability from the underlying architecture determines what kinds of applications the chain can support, and also influences its survival space in future regulatory environments.

At this stage, evaluating a project isn't just about its trading popularity; more importantly, it's about whether its approach to solving fundamental issues can stand the test.