Decentralized storage has long been plagued by ecosystem fragmentation. Filecoin heavily relies on the IPFS ecosystem, while Arweave mainly focuses on its own network. The application scope of these protocols is often limited by the native blockchain, making it difficult to adapt to a multi-chain market landscape.



Walrus has taken a different approach. Although born in the Sui ecosystem, it makes "cross-ecosystem compatibility" its core strategy. Through cross-chain bridging and adaptation layer technology, Walrus already supports mainstream public chains such as Ethereum and Aptos, becoming the industry's first truly multi-chain decentralized storage protocol. Its native token WAL has also evolved into a multi-chain universal storage payment and incentive tool.

This cross-ecosystem compatibility offers advantages in two key aspects:

**Technical adaptation breaks down barriers** — Walrus has developed a universal storage adaptation layer capable of supporting different blockchain smart contract standards. This means that DApps from other ecosystems can access Walrus's storage services without major code modifications. For example, DeFi projects on Ethereum can store risk control data on Walrus, then verify data availability via cross-chain credentials, enjoying low costs and privacy protection.

**Seamless cross-chain asset transfer** — Through partnerships with leading cross-chain bridges, users can exchange stablecoins or tokens from other chains into WAL to pay for storage fees, while storage credentials are cross-chain returned to the original ecosystem. This "payment-storage-credential return" closed-loop operation significantly reduces the usage costs for multi-chain users.

From a token value perspective, WAL's role is also amplified. Regardless of which blockchain users come from, they need to use WAL to pay for storage fees. As cross-ecosystem expansion continues, the demand and usage scenarios for WAL will keep growing, forming a true multi-chain value flow.
FIL-1.98%
AR-2.77%
WAL-10.29%
SUI-0.17%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShadowStakervip
· 4h ago
ngl the multi-chain adapter layer sounds clean on paper, but we've seen this cross-chain bridge story before... how many times til it actually holds water
Reply0
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 11h ago
Sounds good, but are cross-chain bridges really reliable? --- Wait, isn't this just shifting the fragmentation problem onto cross-chain bridges? --- The claim that WAL demand will grow is the same as saying nothing; the key is whether there is a real storage demand. --- The issues with Filecoin and Arweave can be solved by Walrus, but who will address Walrus's single point of failure? --- Another "multi-chain universal" story, just listen and don't take it too seriously. --- Is the cross-chain credential verification reliable? I haven't seen any actual projects using it. --- It sounds nice, but ultimately it depends on whether users have truly migrated. --- Whenever it involves cross-chain bridges, I have one thought: risk stacking. --- Good topic, but the fundamental reason for ecosystem fragmentation is利益问题, not技术问题.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 11h ago
Sounds good, but can Walrus really solve cross-chain fragmentation? It feels like another ecosystem building on top of an ecosystem...
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidatedvip
· 11h ago
Cross-chain storage indeed aligns with Walrus's clear approach, but whether WAL can truly support such a large flow of value depends on subsequent implementation. Speaking of, can Fil and Arweave, which have been locked within their ecosystems for so long, actually break through? I'm a bit skeptical. Walrus's cross-chain closed-loop design is good, but the key is whether the security of the cross-chain bridge is reliable. It feels like another "multi-chain universal" story; let's wait until real DApps are integrated. How is WAL's current liquidity? It seems like the payment tools need to be used to realize their value. Another Sui ecosystem project has gained attention; can this wave of popularity last?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTradervip
· 11h ago
This idea is indeed interesting. The multi-chain adaptation layer is a good breakthrough point. The WAL design logic is quite brilliant, seamlessly connecting the payment closed loop. But it still depends on implementation; the reliability of cross-chain bridges is crucial. Filecoin and Arweave have been tightly controlled by ecosystems over the years, and someone needs to come and break this deadlock. However, projects emerging from the Sui ecosystem... also carry real risks, so caution is necessary.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 11h ago
Sounds good, but can Walrus really solve the cross-chain gas cost issue? --- Multi-chain compatibility sounds nice, but the key is whether users will actually buy it. --- The WAL payment closed-loop system sounds like it's solving a problem it created itself... --- Filecoin is really having a tough time now, but how much market share Walrus can grab remains to be seen. --- The cross-chain credential verification part is a bit uncertain. How is the trust issue guaranteed? --- Both multi-chain and universal... it feels like every project is talking about this, but the real key is who can actually implement it. --- I'm a bit interested in trying it out, but I'll wait to see if major projects in the ecosystem adopt it first.
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionistvip
· 11h ago
Multi-chain adaptation of this logic indeed hits the pain points. It seems that Filecoin is too tightly bound to its ecosystem, while the Walrus approach is actually more flexible. Whether WAL can truly take off still depends on how many DApps are actually implemented.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)