2026-01-09 20:23:12

In the DeFi sector, token incentive design directly impacts user retention. Compared to some leading DEXs adopting fragmented reward schemes, another approach appears more compelling: the more frequent the user behavior → the more on-chain verifications → the more precise the reward model → the higher the engagement continues to grow.

Especially in stablecoin trading scenarios, each payment can be recorded and confirmed, allowing the system to dynamically adjust incentive intensity and guide users to form repeated interactions. What seems like a micro-level cyclical incentive, when accumulated to a certain scale, evolves into a user habit. Such a closed-loop mechanism is more effective for long-term retention than a one-time airdrop.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeWithAPlan

· 11h ago

The airdrop party's nightmare is coming haha

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 11h ago

This logic sounds great, but I haven't seen many protocols that can truly execute it effectively... Most of them ultimately end up being just schemes to harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 11h ago

Research shows that the core of this feedback loop is actually the reinforcement learning model in behavioral economics—frequent interactions themselves become conditioned reflexes for users. From a technical perspective, the feasibility of dynamically adjusting the incentive strength hinges on the real-time accuracy of on-chain data. However, it is worth noting that most projects often overlook a problem during implementation: poorly designed incentive decay curves can easily lead to accelerated user attrition. Based on the following data, the conversion rate for a single airdrop is usually between 3-8%, while precise cyclical incentives can reach 18-35%. This difference indeed warrants in-depth research.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 11h ago

Hey, I’m not really convinced by this incentive logic. Dynamic adjustments sound like it just makes things more competitive over time, right? In the end, it’s still the big players who benefit the most...

View OriginalReply0

NFTregretter

· 11h ago

The closed-loop incentive logic sounds good, but the projects that can truly execute it effectively are few and far between, mostly just a facade for harvesting profits.

View OriginalReply1