$PIPPIN this wave of market movement, the whales have actually been quite restrained. Facing a top-level short seller like KZ, to withstand the pressure and maintain an advantage, the whales need to invest a large amount of capital to fight back, but this in itself is a paradox. From the perspective of financial operations, the recent surge past 23,000 points by the whales is very likely based on some consensus with the capital side—giving up a portion of profits to the capital providers in exchange for a more stable operational space. Capital is inherently profit-driven; since the whales haven't wiped out all the long and short traders, it indicates they are already managing risk.



Many people may not be very familiar with the operational tactics of bridge funding. The process is as follows: after the capital side profits through cooperation, they leave necessary bridge funds to continue operations, allowing the whales to gain a clearer trading environment. This way, both sides get what they need, and no one suffers a loss. Besides this logic, I really can't think of why the whales would make such an aggressive move.

Ultimately, the contract and futures markets are a life-and-death game. But we often forget a key point: whether long or short, participants are living, breathing people. Everyone has to make a living, and everyone has their own desires and demands. This is not a moral issue, but the true nature of market operation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SneakyFlashloanvip
· 7h ago
Basically, the big players and the capital side are actually dancing, each with their own plans. Not clearing out retail investors shows they have a clear understanding in mind, which isn't a bad thing. I've long understood the bridge financing scheme; it's just a game of mutual support. Ultimately, this market is still a battle of human nature, so don't overcomplicate it. CEO K indeed has some skills, but the big players choosing to step back for stability is actually quite smart.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocsvip
· 7h ago
Oh wow, someone finally explained these game rules thoroughly and clearly.
View OriginalReply0
ArbitrageBotvip
· 8h ago
It all feels like an exchange of interests; no one is truly making money. Will the big players really be so restrained? I doubt it. The bridge financing tactic sounds very complicated; retail investors can't keep up. To put it simply, it's still a zero-sum game—someone profits, someone loses. This wave of 23,000 might have been set up long ago; we're just pawns.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapistvip
· 8h ago
Uh... You seem to understand a lot, but whether 23,000 breaks or not is the key, right?
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 8h ago
It sounds like a compromise, with the big players and the capital side each getting what they want. But I just want to know, can retail investors still get a piece of the pie? This tactic feels too familiar, we're about to be "protected" again.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poetvip
· 8h ago
Ha, is it the same bridge funding scheme again? Sounds pretty good, but who really knows? The big players and the capital side are cutting together, and us retail investors are just the ones getting cut. This logic is far-fetched; that 23,000 wave was probably just the last bloodsucking attempt. Talking about everyone getting what they need, I just want to ask, who is giving me my share?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)