🔥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinNIGHT 🔥
Post anything related to NIGHT to join!
Market outlook, project thoughts, research takeaways, user experience — all count.
📅 Event Duration: Dec 10 08:00 - Dec 21 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1️⃣ Post on Gate Square (text, analysis, opinions, or image posts are all valid)
2️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostToWinNIGHT or #发帖赢代币NIGHT
🏆 Rewards (Total: 1,000 NIGHT)
🥇 Top 1: 200 NIGHT
🥈 Top 4: 100 NIGHT each
🥉 Top 10: 40 NIGHT each
📄 Notes
Content must be original (no plagiarism or repetitive spam)
Winners must complete Gate Square identity verification
Gat
I saw that a leading exchange has set up a reward mechanism for whistleblowers, which suddenly made me think of a question: Is it enough to only reward the whistleblowers? What about the early users who suffered losses due to problematic tokens? From a certain perspective, these losses are closely related to the platform’s audit oversights. If users can provide actual proof of their losses, would the platform consider offering some compensation? After all, user trust is the biggest asset for any exchange, and relying solely on rewarding whistleblowers after the fact doesn’t really address the root cause. I wonder if there are any mature solutions in the industry for handling such situations?