Wait, so you're telling me to bridge my assets through your single sequencer setup that needs permission... but then you're out here calling it "permissionless"?



The irony is almost too good. How does that even work? You can't have it both ways – either the sequencer is actually decentralized and open, or it's controlled and gated.

This kind of marketing doublespeak is exactly why people get skeptical about new L2 projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvestervip
· 12-07 11:46
Nah, this is just ridiculous. You still have to apply for permission even as a single sequencer, so how can it be called permissionless... Classic Web3 marketing tactics, haha.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 12-07 08:53
Haha, I knew it. I've seen too many of these marketing tricks.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 12-07 08:53
theoretically speaking, if we model the sequencer's permission matrix as a recursive constraint system... the math just doesn't add up. you can't have B(permissionless) AND B(gated) both evaluate to true in the same state. it's literally a contradiction in the zero-knowledge paradigm itself.
Reply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 12-07 08:50
LOL, this is a classic case of "Schrödinger's decentralization," isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 12-07 08:45
LOL, permissionless my ass, you still need a separate sequencer’s approval? This is the biggest scam in web3.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)