Recently, watching governance voting feels a bit like watching a pixelated mini-theater I drew myself: on stage they say "community co-governance," off stage everyone delegates their votes to a few big accounts, and in the end it turns into those few giant cats having a meeting... To put it simply, who does the governance token really govern? It might still be the laziness and fear of trouble of ordinary people. Even more absurd is that the testnet's point system expectations can also be competitive, with everyone guessing in the group "Will the mainnet issue tokens?" every day, but when it comes to the voting stage, it's just "I've delegated, you guys handle it." I don't pretend to be lofty either, I have delegated before, it's convenient, but I always feel that after handing over the steering wheel, I’m not quite brave enough to ask where the car is going. First, I’ll revoke a few old authorizations in my wallet, and by the way, I want to at least click once myself in the next vote.